The International Financial Services Centres Authority (IFSCA) has significantly expanded the scope of Indian companies eligible to list their securities in permissible foreign jurisdictions, specifically within IFSCA-regulated International Financial Services Centres (IFSCs). This critical amendment, detailed in “The Companies (Listing of equity instruments in permissible jurisdictions) Amendment Rules, 2026” issued on 04 November 2026, redefines “equity instruments” and opens the door for unlisted public companies in IFSCs to access global capital markets.
Practitioners must immediately review the expanded definitions and eligibility criteria, particularly regarding the inclusion of convertible debentures and preference shares, and the new pathways for unlisted public companies operating under IFSC jurisdiction.
What Changed: The 30-Second Answer
The IFSCA Notification 2026, titled “The Companies (Listing of equity instruments in permissible jurisdictions) Amendment Rules, 2026,” issued on 04 November 2026, significantly amends the 2024 rules. It redefines “shares” as “instruments” to include equity shares, convertible debentures, and preference shares. Crucially, it expands eligibility for listing in permissible jurisdictions to include unlisted public companies operating within the International Financial Services Centres (IFSC) jurisdiction, provided they comply with the IFSCA Act, 2019, and its regulations. This broadens the capital-raising avenues for Indian companies in IFSCs.
Who Does This IFSCA Notification 2026 Apply To?
This amendment primarily impacts Indian companies seeking to list their securities in permissible foreign jurisdictions, with a specific focus on those operating within the International Financial Services Centres (IFSC) ecosystem. The rules apply to:
- Indian Companies: Any Indian company looking to list its securities in a permissible jurisdiction.
- Public Companies in IFSCs: Public companies operating within an IFSC jurisdiction, previously excluded from certain provisions, are now explicitly brought under the purview of these rules. The amendment clarifies that “other than public companies in the International Financial Services Centres jurisdiction” is inserted after “companies” in clause (a) of rule 3, and a new clause (c) is added to include “unlisted public companies in the International Financial Services Centres jurisdiction.”
- Companies with Negative Net Worth: The rules introduce a specific proviso for companies with a negative net worth, allowing them to issue equity instruments for listing if they commit to allotting at least seventy-five percent of the net offer to qualified institutional buyers, in accordance with the regulations of the respective securities market regulator in the permissible jurisdiction.
This expansion means a broader set of entities can leverage the IFSC platform for capital raising. For more context on IFSCA’s regulatory landscape, see Algoy’s coverage on IFSCA Amends Listing Rules: Expands Eligible Instruments and Companies for IFSC Listings.
What Constitutes “Equity Instruments” Under the New Rules?
A fundamental change introduced by this IFSCA Notification 2026 is the redefinition of the term “shares” to “instruments” throughout the principal rules. This is not merely a linguistic tweak; it significantly expands the types of securities that Indian companies can list in permissible jurisdictions. As per sub-rule (1) of rule 2, after clause (b), a new clause (ba) is inserted, explicitly stating that “equity instruments” now mean:
- Equity Shares: The traditional form of ownership.
- Convertible Debentures: Debt instruments that can be converted into equity shares at a future date.
- Preference Shares: Shares that carry preferential rights regarding dividend payments and repayment of capital.
This broadened definition offers companies more flexibility in structuring their offerings to attract diverse investor pools in global markets. It’s a pragmatic move to align Indian regulations with international market practices, where a wider array of equity-linked instruments is commonly traded.
What Are the New Eligibility Conditions for Listing?
The amendment modifies certain eligibility conditions, particularly for companies with a negative net worth and those with prior defaults. These changes are crucial for compliance officers and CFOs to understand:
- Negative Net Worth Companies: Previously, a negative net worth might have been a barrier. However, clause (d) of rule 5 now includes a proviso: “Provided that a company having a negative net worth shall be eligible to issue its equity instruments for listing, if the issuer undertakes to allot at least seventy-five per cent. of the net offer to qualified institutional buyers in accordance with the regulations framed in this regard by the respective securities market regulator in permissible jurisdiction for purpose of this rule.” This provides a clear pathway for such companies, contingent on a significant allocation to Qualified Institutional Buyers (QIBs).
- Defaults on Debt Instruments: The rules also refine the conditions related to defaults. In clause (g) of rule 5, after “specified period,” the words “and such default has not been made good” are inserted. This clarifies that a company remains ineligible for listing if a default on its debt instruments or other borrowings for a specified period has not been rectified. This emphasizes the importance of a clean financial record.
- Timeframe for Prior Defaults: For the proviso in clause (e) of rule 5, the words “two years” are replaced with “more than six months.” This implies a change in the look-back period or the duration of conditions related to certain prior events, making the criteria potentially more stringent or flexible depending on the context of the original rule.
What Has Changed in the Prospectus Submission Form (LEAP-1)?
The Second Schedule of the principal rules sees a complete substitution of Form LEAP-1, which is the “Form for submission of Prospectus with the Registrar (Listing of equity instruments in permissible jurisdictions – 1).” This updated form, prescribed pursuant to sub-section (3) of section 23 of the Companies Act, 2013, and rule 4 of the Companies (Listing of Equity instruments in Permissible Jurisdictions) Rules, 2024, now requires:
- Expanded Information Fields: The revised form includes mandatory fields for the company’s Corporate Identity Number (CIN), name, registered office address, and e-mail ID.
- Purpose of Application: It specifically asks for the purpose as “Filing of prospectus,” requiring the date of approval from the securities regulator/stock exchange and the date of submission of the prospectus.
- Inspection/Investigation/Inquiry Disclosure: A new section mandates disclosure regarding any pending inspection, investigation, or inquiry ordered against the company under the Companies Act, 2013, requiring a ‘Yes’ or ‘No’ response for each.
- Attachments: Mandatory attachments now include a copy of the approval from the securities regulator/stock exchange, a copy of the acknowledgment of prospectus filing, and the prospectus itself.
- Declaration and Certification: The declaration requires a digital signature from a Director, Manager, Company Secretary, CEO, or CFO, along with their identification number. A practicing professional (Chartered Accountant, Cost Accountant, or Company Secretary) must also certify the truth, correctness, and completeness of the information, including attachments, based on original records.
This revised form streamlines the submission process while ensuring comprehensive disclosure and professional certification, enhancing transparency and accountability in the listing process within IFSCs. The meticulous nature of this form echoes the enhanced oversight seen in other recent IFSCA directives, such as IFSCA Mandates New Cyber Security Certifications for Designated Officers and Key Personnel in IFSCs.
The Algoy Perspective
The IFSCA’s move to broaden the definition of “equity instruments” and include unlisted public companies in IFSCs is a strategic play to enhance the attractiveness of India’s International Financial Services Centres. However, the nuance lies in the operationalization of the negative net worth proviso. While allowing such companies to list with a 75% QIB allocation opens a critical funding avenue, it places a significant burden on the “respective securities market regulator in permissible jurisdiction” to define what constitutes a “qualified institutional buyer” and the specific regulations governing such allocations. The circular is silent on these specifics, leaving a potential regulatory gap that could lead to inconsistent interpretation across different permissible jurisdictions. Compliance teams must anticipate varied requirements and proactively engage with legal counsel to understand how this proviso will be applied in their target listing destinations.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the effective date of these new rules?
These rules, titled “The Companies (Listing of equity instruments in permissible jurisdictions) Amendment Rules, 2026,” shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette, which occurred on 04 November 2026.
Can unlisted public companies in IFSCs now list their equity instruments?
Yes, the amendment explicitly states that “unlisted public companies in the International Financial Services Centres jurisdiction” are now eligible to list, provided they comply with the provisions of the International Financial Services Centres Authority Act, 2019, and the regulations framed thereunder.
What types of securities are covered by the new “equity instruments” definition?
The term “equity instruments” now means equity shares, convertible debentures, and preference shares issued by an Indian Company, significantly broadening the scope beyond just equity shares under the previous rules.
What are the implications for companies with a negative net worth seeking to list?
A company with a negative net worth can now be eligible to issue its equity instruments for listing if it undertakes to allot at least seventy-five percent of the net offer to qualified institutional buyers, in accordance with the regulations of the respective securities market regulator in the permissible jurisdiction.
Sources and Further Reading
- The Companies (Listing of equity instruments in permissible jurisdictions) Amendment Rules, 2026
- International Financial Services Centres Authority (IFSCA)
- Search and track this circular on RegChat, Algoy’s regulatory chatbot
Track every new RBI, SEBI and IFSCA circular and ask questions in plain English on RegChat — Algoy’s free regulatory chatbot.
