IFSCA Amends Listing Rules: Expands Eligible Instruments and Companies for IFSC Listings

The International Financial Services Centres Authority (IFSCA) has significantly broadened the scope of instruments and entities eligible for listing in permissible jurisdictions, particularly within the IFSC. This move, captured by the IFSCA Notification 2026, aims to deepen the financial markets in India’s IFSCs and attract a wider array of issuers.

What Changed: The 30-Second Answer

The IFSCA, through The Companies (Listing of equity instruments in permissible jurisdictions) Amendment Rules, 2026, issued on 04 November 2026, has expanded the definition of “equity instruments” to include convertible debentures and preference shares, beyond just equity shares. Crucially, unlisted public companies within the IFSC jurisdiction are now eligible for listing, subject to IFSCA Act, 2019 provisions and associated regulations. This IFSCA Notification 2026 also modifies eligibility criteria for companies with negative net worth and shortens the look-back period for certain defaults.

Who Does This IFSCA Notification 2026 Apply To?

This amendment primarily impacts Indian companies looking to list their securities in permissible jurisdictions, specifically those operating within the International Financial Services Centres (IFSC) jurisdiction. The original Companies (Listing of equity shares in permissible jurisdictions) Rules, 2024, are “further to amend” the framework, meaning all entities previously covered remain subject to the updated provisions.

Specifically, the scope now extends to:

Indian Companies: The core target remains Indian companies issuing equity instruments.
Unlisted Public Companies in IFSC: A significant expansion allows “unlisted public companies in the International Financial Services Centres jurisdiction” to list, provided they comply with the International Financial Services Centres Authority Act, 2019, and its regulations. This marks a clear intent to leverage the IFSC as a listing venue for a broader class of Indian entities.
Companies with Negative Net Worth: Such companies are now explicitly eligible to issue equity instruments for listing if they “undertakes to allot at least seventy-five per cent. of the net offer to qualified institutional buyers” as per the respective securities market regulator’s rules in the permissible jurisdiction. This is a crucial relaxation, opening doors for high-growth, pre-profit companies.

The notification clarifies that “companies” mentioned in the original rules, specifically in clause (a) of rule 3, now explicitly exclude “public companies in the International Financial Services Centres jurisdiction.” This segregation underscores the distinct regulatory path for IFSC-based public companies. For more context on previous expansions, see IFSCA Expands Listing Eligibility for Indian Companies in IFSCs, Broadens “Equity Instruments” Definition.

What “Equity Instruments” Now Mean for Listing

A key definitional change broadens “shares” to “instruments” throughout the principal rules. The newly inserted clause (ba) in sub-rule (1) of rule 2 explicitly defines “equity instruments” as “equity shares, convertible debentures, preference shares issued by an Indian Company.” This expansion is significant; it means companies can now list a wider range of capital-raising instruments beyond just pure equity, offering greater flexibility in their capital structure and attracting a more diverse investor base in IFSCs. This aligns with the IFSCA’s broader strategy to enhance the attractiveness of the IFSC as a financial hub.

New Eligibility Criteria and Compliance Actions

Practitioners must review several updated eligibility criteria and make corresponding adjustments to their compliance frameworks. Here’s a breakdown of the key changes:

“Existing Holders” vs. “Existing Shareholders”: The term “existing shareholders” has been replaced with “existing holders” in rule 4. This reflects the expanded definition of “equity instruments,” encompassing holders of convertible debentures and preference shares, not just equity shareholders. Companies must update their internal documentation and communication to align with this broader terminology.
Negative Net Worth Companies: As noted, companies with negative net worth are now eligible for listing their equity instruments if they commit to allotting at least “seventy-five per cent. of the net offer to qualified institutional buyers” in accordance with the relevant securities market regulator’s rules in the permissible jurisdiction. This requires a clear undertaking from the issuer and adherence to specific QIB allocation norms.
Reduced Look-Back Period for Certain Defaults: The proviso in clause (e) of rule 5 has been amended. The phrase “two years” has been replaced with “more than six months.” This likely refers to a shorter look-back period for certain defaults – though the specific nature of the default is not detailed in this circular. Companies should scrutinize their compliance history for the past six months more carefully.
Default Remediation: Clause (g) of rule 5 now includes the phrase “and such default has not been made good” after “specified period.” This implies that simply having a default within a specified period might not be disqualifying if the default has been rectified. Companies with past defaults should ensure complete remediation before applying for listing.

Updated Form LEAP-1 for Prospectus Submission

The Second Schedule of the principal rules has been entirely replaced with a new “Form No. LEAP – 1” for the submission of prospectuses with the Registrar. This form is “Pursuant to sub-section (3) of section 23 of the Companies Act, 2013 and rule 4 of the Companies (Listing of Equity instruments in Permissible Jurisdictions) Rules, 2024.”

Key changes and requirements in the new Form LEAP-1 include:

Mandatory Fields: All fields marked with an asterisk (*) are mandatory, including Corporate Identity Number (CIN), Company Name, Registered Office Address, E-mail ID, and the Purpose of application (Filing of prospectus).
Approval and Submission Dates: Companies must provide the “Date of approval of Securities regulator/stock exchange” and the “Date of submission of prospectus with Securities regulator/stock exchange.” These dates must be in DD/MM/YYYY format.
Inspection, Investigation, or Inquiry Information: The form now explicitly requires disclosure of whether an inspection, investigation, or inquiry has been ordered against the company under the Companies Act, 2013, with “Yes/No” options.
Attachments: Mandatory attachments include a “Copy of the approval of securities regulator/stock exchange,” “Copy of acknowledgement of filing of prospectus,” and “Copy of the prospectus.” Each attachment has a maximum file size of 2 MB.
Declaration and Digital Signature: A declaration affirming the correctness and completeness of the information must be digitally signed by a Director, Manager, Company Secretary, CEO, or CFO. Their respective identification numbers (DIN, PAN, or Membership number) are required.
Practicing Professional Certificate: A certificate from a practicing Chartered Accountant, Cost Accountant, or Company Secretary (in whole-time practice) is mandatory. This professional must verify the particulars from the company’s original records and certify their truthfulness, correctness, and completeness. Their membership and certificate of practice numbers are required.
Warning on False Statements: The form prominently draws attention to Sections 448 and 449 of the Companies Act, 2013, which provide for punishment for false statements or certifications and false evidence.

Companies preparing for listing in permissible jurisdictions must immediately adopt this new Form LEAP-1. Ensuring all mandatory fields are completed, relevant approvals are secured, and the prospectus is accurately submitted is paramount. Any misrepresentation or incomplete submission could lead to significant penalties under the Companies Act, 2013. For broader regulatory changes impacting IFSC entities, practitioners might also find value in IFSCA Mandates New Cyber Security Certifications for Designated Officers and Key Personnel in IFSCs.

The Algoy Perspective

The IFSCA’s amendments, particularly the inclusion of unlisted public companies in the IFSC jurisdiction and the expanded definition of “equity instruments,” are designed to make the IFSC a more attractive global financial hub. However, the practical implementation for companies with negative net worth – requiring “at least seventy-five per cent. of the net offer to qualified institutional buyers” – presents a significant hurdle. Identifying and securing commitments from QIBs for a substantial portion of an offering, especially from a company with negative net worth, demands sophisticated investor relations and a compelling growth story. This isn’t a mere compliance checkbox; it’s a strategic challenge requiring early engagement with institutional investors and robust financial projections. Companies must develop clear strategies to target and convince QIBs, understanding their specific risk appetites and investment mandates, well before approaching regulators for listing approval. This proactive investor engagement will be the true differentiator for successful listings under these new, more flexible rules.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the effective date of The Companies (Listing of equity instruments in permissible jurisdictions) Amendment Rules, 2026?

These rules “shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.” The notification was issued on 04 November 2026, implying immediate effect from that date.

Can unlisted public companies in India list directly in an IFSC under these new rules?

Yes, the rules explicitly state that “unlisted public companies in the International Financial Services Centres jurisdiction” are now eligible for listing. This is conditional upon their compliance with the provisions of the International Financial Services Centres Authority Act, 2019, and the regulations framed thereunder.

What types of instruments can Indian companies now list in permissible jurisdictions?

As per the amendment, “equity instruments” are defined as “equity shares, convertible debentures, preference shares issued by an Indian Company.” This broadens the scope beyond just equity shares, offering greater fundraising flexibility.

Are there any specific conditions for companies with negative net worth to list their equity instruments?

A company with negative net worth is eligible to issue its equity instruments for listing if “the issuer undertakes to allot at least seventy-five per cent. of the net offer to qualified institutional buyers” in accordance with the regulations by the respective securities market regulator in the permissible jurisdiction.

Sources and Further Reading

Track every new RBI, SEBI and IFSCA circular and ask questions in plain English on RegChat — Algoy’s free regulatory chatbot.